Thursday, January 19, 2012

What Is A Carcinogen?

Inquiring Minds Want To Know

When I continually read how this ingredient and that ingredient is a carcinogen or has carcinogenic properties, I have actually wondered, what exactly does that mean? It has always been a completely ambiguous statement and has never had relevance equated with it. Just a lovely statement regurgitated over and over by the many that hate all things chemical....of course not truly understanding the very definition of what a chemical is.

But the word "carcinogen" seems to have become synonymous with "chemical", when in fact to truly understand what a carcinogen is, would make more sense to me rather than the causal link to something proven or unproven. As I have explained in past articles, Doctors have shown and proven that fruits and vegetables are good for us, yet these same healthy foods, including coffee for coffee lovers, have carcinogenic properties, while they provide anti-mutagenic properties as well, such as the health benefits of anti-oxidants. Clearly these benefits far outweigh any slight chance of the same as ever causing cancer, if they weren't we wouldn't be being advised to eat 5-7 servings per put down that " twinkie".....which is far more harmful to good health than an apple or orange with trace amounts of Acetaldehyde.

This word (carcinogen), like "chemical" creates concern for many, so I decided to delve beyond the inflammatory articles trying to correlate this supposedly scary relation between the two and learn.......

What Exactly Is A Carcinogen? (Guest Article)

I know cancer has probably touched everyone’s life (as it has mine) and prevention is certainly easier than a cure. I spent many years of my life studying cancer and the process of carcinogenesis and even have a few scientific papers to show for it. The intense interest that the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics and Environmental Working Group have in banning carcinogens brings up the question as to what exactly is a carcinogen and how dangerous are they? Even though we of course want to protect ourselves as much as possible from cancer, it is not correct to think that anything that is a carcinogen causes cancer. Many of the damaging effects of carcinogens are actually countered by anti-carcinogens that might occur side by side especially in fruits and vegetables. As a farmer and herbalist I need to speak up when someone says they want to ban all carcinogens.

Cancer is a little understood and complicated process that occurs in a multi-step progression taking 20 years or more, which explains why it is more common as we age. It is a disease of cell growth. The normal mechanisms that stimulate and inhibit cell growth are changed in a way as to allow the cell to grow uncontrollably.

There are four definable phases of carcinogenesis (cancer development); initiation, promotion, progression and malignant conversion; each stage lasting years. Testing for carcinogens are just as complicated because different cellular changes occur during each stage.

The first stage, initiation, involves a change in the genetic makeup of a cell. This change can and does occur randomly or when a given chemical interacts with DNA, causing a mutation in the genetic code. Chemicals that cause mutations are known as genotoxins. One important test done to determine if a chemical is a genotoxin is the Ames test. The Ames test, developed by Dr. Bruce Ames in the early 1970’s, is used because it is a rapid and fairly easy screen for DNA mutations. The test uses a single celled bacterium as the indicator organism; an already mutated strain of Salmonella typhimurium. Chemicals being tested are incubated with the bacteria in petri dishes. If the bacteria shows growth in a certain selected media, then this is evidence of DNA mutation or genotoxicity and the chemical can be classified as a carcinogen.

What are some problems with this? Well, lets name just a few:

  1. Bacterial cells and human cells are quite different. If you remember back to high school biology; bacteria are prokaryotes and human cells are eukaryotes.

  2. Human organisms have enzymes that work to detoxify and eliminate mutagens before they can cause damage to the DNA. These enzymes are particularly prevalent in the liver and skin.

  3. The nuclei of human cells have in place mechanisms for repairing DNA that is mutated; proofreading mechanisms.

  4. For cancer to occur there must be more than one mutation occurring in the DNA. Mutations must occur in specific classes of genes that regulate cell growth (or death) and multiple mutations must occur over a period of many years.

  5. When and if cancer cells develop as a result of multiple mutations, they express an antigen that is recognizable by the immune system so they can be removed and destroyed.

  6. The doses used in the Ames test are very high doses that might never occur in humans.

  7. As explained above, cancer requires multiple mutations in specific classes of genes before a cell actually transforms into a cancer cell; not just one mutation in a random gene.
Everyone has mutated and transformed cells in our body at all times. When DNA becomes mutated, the cell first tries to correct that mutation. Because there are many genes that affect cell growth; including those that speed up growth and those that inhibit growth, there are many safeguards in place to prevent a cell from growing uncontrollably and becoming cancer. If those safety mechanisms do fail. there are mechanisms in place to force death in a transformed cell. In other words, that one cell is sacrificed for the good of the entire organism. This process is called apoptosis.

Dr. Ames himself sought to ban many synthetic substances in the 70's because they were mutagenic in the Ames test. However, he later reversed his position saying that there is no scientific evidence that small doses of these synthetic chemicals cause human cancers. Part of his reversed opinion was the finding that many plants (fruits, vegetables, and herbs) also contain chemicals that are mutagenic. He said "There are over 1,000 natural chemicals in a cup of coffee, and only 22 have been tested. Of these, 17 are carcinogens."

Ames realized that regardless of whether chemicals are synthetic or naturally occurring they cause cancer when fed to laboratory animals at extremely high doses. He also found that this was a very politically incorrect conclusion. The environmental activists Ames said, "have a religion" that says that corporations are behind an exploding epidemic of cancer. This religion was promoted by handful of doctors (Samuel Epstein of the University of Illinois at Chicago), by a media looking for headlines, and by celebrity spokespeople such as Jane Fonda and Meryl Streep. "The idea that chemical companies are giving consumers cancer just isn’t true," he said. The main cause of cancer is old age. EPA allows for synthetic pesticides."

Dr. Ames also does not think that low levels of pesticide residues eaten by consumers are harmful. However, the amounts farmhands are exposed to are different and strict rules should be in place to reduce exposure for them and for chemical workers. With only 9% of Americans eating the amounts of fruits and vegetables they should, the cost of eliminating synthetic pesticides would further decrease the amount of fruits and vegetables ingested. Since fruits and vegetables are one proven way to decrease cancer risks this would increase the risk of cancer. Dr. Ames is a well known and well respected scientist and even at the age of 82 he is still Professor of Biochemistry at UC Berkley doing nutrition and aging research.

Information about Bruce Ames came from Michael Fumento's site:

For more information on the Ames test see:

Our Guest Writer: At one time Dr. Cindy Jones, PhD, was a Cancer Biologist doing research on mechanisms of cell growth. She now enjoys her work as a cosmetic formulator and herb grower. Her company is Sagescript Institute, llc.

Protected by Copyscape Online Infringement Detector

No comments:

Post a Comment